In the 1930s, Lewis Sperry Chafer, president of Dallas
Theological Seminary said,
Systematic Theology, the greatest of the sciences, has fallen upon evil days. Between the rejection and ridicule of it by the so-called progressives and the neglect and abridgment of it by the orthodox, it, as a potent influence, is approaching the point of extinction. It is a significant act that of the upwards of two score accredited and notable works on Systematic Theology which have been produced in this and other countries, an exceedingly small portion is now in print and the demand for these works is negligible.
That was in the 30s. Back when Christians were supposedly
“more Christian” and less worldly than they are today. What would Chafer think
if he saw the Christians of today? The fact is we’re looking at a steep
academic decline in Christianity amongst the laypeople. Pastors are pastors,
theologians are theologians, and seminarians are seminarians. I’m not
addressing them. I’m addressing the average “Joe Sunday School.”
What does your study life look like? I don’t hear the term
“daily devotions” too much anymore, but when I was growing up back in the 90s I
heard it all the time. We were basically force fed the idea of sitting down for
15 min and reading the Bible everyday. There’s nothing wrong with that, its
perfectly healthy. The problem is, we were never encouraged to take it beyond
that (I’m referring to the Christian culture I was surrounded by, I’m not
talking about my parents). And well, it’s a no wonder people don’t really know
Scripture anymore besides what’s on the surface. Most Christians can partially
defend themselves by just quoting Scripture, but they seemingly can’t exegete.
Quoting Scripture is good, but if you don’t know how Scripture works, how can
you use it to its fullest?
Let me make two examples of this, so you don’t get the wrong
idea about what I’m saying. First is the idea of a sword in the hands of a
novice. Sure, he can cut, he can block, he may even kill, but is that sword
being used to its utmost? No. Picking up a sword does not make one a swordsman.
Second, think about how the Jewish Rabbinical system worked
in Jesus’ time. At the age of 4, children were entered into seminaries. Until
the age of 12, they did nothing but memorize the Torah. They were not taught
application, only memorization. If they chose to continue the Rabbinical path,
they then spent their life from their 12th until their 30th
year memorizing the rest of the Old Testament, and also learning how to apply
Law.
Now lets take those two perspectives and set them against
our own lives. How many of us are stuck in the 4-12 year old range? How many of
us are novices with our swords? Sure, we can swing it around, but can we wield
it? To the one who picks up a sword with
interest, he trains, and trains, and trains. This doesn’t mean picking up a
sword and swinging it wildly day in and day out. It means practicing, working
with skilled teachers, and just straight-up hard work. There is an interest, a
drive, a passion to become the most he can become, to become the most skilled
with his weapon. To the Jew, memorizing the Torah wasn’t enough. It was about
learning how to use it, bonding oneself with a Rabbi for daily instruction, and
reading the Targums and Midrash to familiarize oneself with perspectives on
Scripture.
How well do we mirror these practices? One of the big issues
in today’s society is people’s perspective on homosexuality. If someone were to
confront you on this issue and say that Paul in Romans 1:26-28 was speaking of
Greek pederasty or of heterosexuals performing homosexual acts, how would you
respond? Are you familiar with five simple Greek words that would disprove the
entire position? If not, why?
One opposition to this idea is that of being opposed to
doctrine itself. In Rob Bell’s book, Velvet Elvis, he puts forth the idea that doctrine is like a brick wall, keeping
people out instead of inviting them in to jump on the trampoline. He maintains
the perspective that Christianity is about the experience, not about doctrine
and facts. But, can I ask you one thing? What does it take to be considered a
“mature” Christian? Can you give one qualification? The fact is, the Bible only
gives one. Just one. In Hebrews 5:9-6:2 the author states that his audience is
unable to understand the teaching of Christ’s priesthood through Melchizedek.
It is solid food, for the mature Christian. He states that his audience is
immature, only able to handle milk, but not meat. What is his point here? His
point is that only through knowledge comes maturity. You cannot become mature by only drinking milk. He
then gives a list of “elementary teachings:” “repentance
from dead works and of faith toward God,
of instruction about washings and
laying on of hands, and the resurrection of the dead and eternal judgment.”
Now think about your own personal
study. Think about what your pastor preaches, and what your Sunday School
teacher teaches. How much of your intake is made up of these three things? We
should instead be “pressing on to maturity,” by taking in more than just milk.
How do I suggest you do that? Here’s some ways I think can help you.
1) Partner yourself in someway with someone more knowledgeable
than you. A person, not a book or a video. Someone who went to Bible college,
at least. Develop a mentoring relationship with that person, and through their
guidance, develop your understanding of God’s Word.
2) Pick up a book that’s a tad too hard for you. Its like
lifting weights. If you lift the same amount all the time, your muscles will
condition themselves only to lift that much, and won’t grow. By reading things
that are harder than the usual, you force yourself to understand them, even if
the progress is slow. Don’t lean on pastoral books, either. Pastors like John
Piper and Tim Keller are certainly great influences, but they didn’t get where
they are by only reading men who write like themselves. Aim for scholarly
works, not [only] Christian living.
3) Get yourself a “starter set” of Christian study materials.
For starters, I would look at a Bible dictionary, a good Strong’s Concordance
(not the mini ones), and a book on doctrine or theology (Wayne Grudem’s Bible
Doctrine is a good start). If you want to
push a little harder, some must haves are an interlinear Greek- English New
Testament, and an unabridged Systematic
Theology. If you want to kick it into overdrive, subscribe to a theological
journal. These are usually published by seminaries, and are rough sailing (some
examples are Bibliotheca Sacra, Journal
of the Evangelical Theological Society or
JETS. Master’s seminary, Trinity, and Westminster all have their own as well).
4) Start collecting commentaries. A lot of good ones out there
from very easy all the way to completely unreadable :D. If you’re doing daily
devotions, add a commentary. If you want to push yourself add two- one that is
more focused on grammar and one that is more focused on application. If you’re
one of the many people that don’t often read your Bible, then get a commentary
to follow what your pastor is teaching. It’s a good way to prepare yourself for
each Sunday. (Also, start reading your Bible!)
Those
should be some good starter steps for you. My urge for you is to not be wholly
satisfied with just reading Scripture.
The Bible is a living, breathing document, not just words on a page. It
requires thought and striving on the behalf of the reader. Never be fully
satisfied with just reading the Bible daily, but have a thirst to grow
stronger, smarter, and more mature in the handling of what God has given us.
Peace be
with you,
Mike
Ps. Just
so you don’t think I’m talking down to you, for those of us that are mature, I’m urging you to not become an old kung-fu monk.
I love kung fu movies, and every one seems to have an old man that lives in the
mountains with a long white fu-manchu who has reached some kind of kung-fu
enlightenment. And what’s he always doing? Training his butt off? Nope, he’s
always sitting around drinking or meditating. Or both. The idea here is that
he’s gotten to some kind of invincible stage where he doesn’t need to train
anymore, so he just meditates all day and then beats up people who come to
bother him for training. Lets not be like that. We should never get to the
point where we say, “I’ve done my work, let me rest.” While our minds are still
intact, we should always be training, lest we become rusty. I have trouble with this. I get to points where I say, "Man, I've been studying a lot lately. What else is there to learn right now? Not much, let's take a break." And, things go downhill from there. So, don’t become an
old kung-fu monk. :)
I really like this, Michael. I think it's very important to point this out to women as well. Nowadays "women's studies" are just filled with fluff and make women think they are doing an in-depth study simply because the author has a Greek or Hebrew word and definition in the margin, ah-hem, Beth -cringe- Moore. I challenge women to take on male authors and step away from all that mushy, emotional, just applicational fluff. Let's not sell ourselves short!
ReplyDeleteDefinitely. There's a lot more out there. I think what is the real problem is that the men are not studying either. When the husband doesn't take on difficult issues, the wife won't. Nonetheless, I honestly am against this sort of "women's study" vs. "men's study" trend. I think its healthy for churches to have separate men's and women's Bible studies, but there needs to be fewer of those, with the emphasis on bringing the men and women together. Its like in our Church, we have the Precepts Sunday School, which is great, and its packed every Sunday. Problem is, its sooo packed that the other classes have hardly any women in them. The men in the Church are set apart as leaders, and as authorities over the women. So what good is it if you have a class where the majority of the women are there and have been there for the last two years with no male influences in probably the only "teaching" environment they experience during the week? It certainly is a problem.
ReplyDelete